Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:10:30 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: <Ctrl-C> interrupt failure after upgrading 1.3.6-6 to 1.3.7-1
Message-ID: <20020121031030.GB22374@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <001901c1a20b$a3e1aaa0$6d7b1f3e AT leper>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <001901c1a20b$a3e1aaa0$6d7b1f3e@leper>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:39:01PM -0000, fergus at bonhard dot uklinux dot net wrote:
>>  ls -lR seems to terminate just fine with CTRL-C.
>
>Yes, <ctrl-c> worked for me too in this case.
>
>>  'cygcheck -r -s -v' might help track this down.
>
>Thanks for this suggestion. I tried 'cygcheck -r -s -v' under each regime.
>The resulting screeds are very similar (and very long) and wonder whether
>you would at least take a look at the difference between them. (It looks
>utterly unexceptionable to me. But I don't know what to look for.) As
>follows:

I wasn't asking you to track things down by looking at cygcheck -r -s -v.
I was saying that you should post your results.

That's kinda the whole point with cygcheck -r -s -v.

Regardless, the other person who responded to this thread, who sent in
the output, gave me the clue that I needed.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/