Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: sed : Not compatible between cygwin-B20 and cygwin-2.125.2.10
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:08:25 -0600
Message-ID: <NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKEEDKCJAA.g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <20020118013022.GA5942@redhat.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor

[snip]

> >But same command work on cygwin-B20.
> 
> Hello from the year 2002!
> 
> When, we reach, at some point in the distant future, cygwin version 
> 2.125.2.10,
> I will try to make sure that I remember this problem.  Or, possibly, I will
> leave some provision in my will for my heirs and cygwin successors.
> 
> Luckily, it works just fine now, however.  Phew.
> 
> cgf
> 

Why did everything work so much better in B20?

"...Hair was short and skirts were long,
Kate Smith really sold a song,
I don't know just what went wrong,
Those were the days!"

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot. 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/