Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C4617B1.7A7A5C31@x-ray.at> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:15:45 +0000 From: Reini Urban Organization: http://www.x-ray.at X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [de] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: error trying to compile anything References: <1011214219 DOT 8034 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020116182829 DOT 02304590 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reini: > >what about "real" versioning of the cygwin.dll finally? > >perl did the half-baked thing (perl56.dll), though I heavily voted for > >the real thing that times. > >cygwin also (cygwin1.dll). why not cygwin-$(version).dll => cygwin-1.1.6.dll > > > >this is not FAT16 anymore. we have w95/98/ME and NT systems only. > >all support long filenames. > >duplicate dll's will be gone. microsoft dll hell will be past tense. "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" schrieb: > The issue is not as simple as just DLL names. Of course, if you want > to show us all your dandy solution, provide a patch and it will be > thoughtfully reviewed. is this list about politics (software design) or patches (software implementation) only? of course dll names are just part of the game. but an important one, which bit microsoft heavily AFAIK. cygwin does support softlinks, so we should use them. the implementation is trivial, but there should be consense. -- Reini Urban http://atelier.akbild.ac.at/ (soon) http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ (big) http://tv.mur.at/ (kulturelles) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/