Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D767B2128@wilber.adroit.com> From: "Robinow, David" To: "'Elwood C. Downey'" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: Cygwin and XEphem Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:30:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Terms: This source code is available without charge. You may modify it for your personal use but you may not distribute your changes nor use any portion (original or modified) in other programs without prior permission from us. -----Original Message----- From: Elwood C. Downey [mailto:ecdowney AT clearskyinstitute DOT com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:13 AM To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Cygwin and XEphem Hello Chris, I am still interested in using Cygwin to build the Windows edition of my Astro program, XEphem. When I last approached Cygnus three years ago they said this would cost me a one-time buy-out fee of $100,000 because XEphem is not GPL. Nuts to that. But now I see that the Red Hat language is not so strict. All it says now is: "The GPL requires the source to any application built with the Cygwin libraries must be distributed with the application." Now this I can live with. I have always made the source to XEphem available for download at no charge. Does this mean I can finally use Cygwin without buying the outlandish buy-out license?? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/