Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3C3E328B.4080403@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:32:11 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jon Leichter <jon AT symas DOT com>
CC: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com, hschwentner AT yahoo DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Compiling apps to Mingw32 with cygwin
References: <DLEBJKNCNLJEDKMKICHGCENLCBAA DOT jon AT symas DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jon Leichter wrote:


> It's true that I don't usually patch the script myself and send it back. In
> some cases, there isn't any organization to send the patches back to, e.g.
> GDBM. This is not an unsubstaniated statement. I sent patches to GDBM years
> ago, and nothing ever came of it.


What patches?  Do they affect functionality, or just the build process? 
  If  <phil AT cs DOT wwu DOT edu> and  <downsj AT downsj DOT com>  aren't interested, we 
can at least add them to cygwin's gdbm if they provide important bugfixes...

--Chuck
cygwin gdbm maintainer



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/