Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C3B245B.8090601@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 11:54:51 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Robinow, David" CC: "'Ralph Buse'" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: windows 98 message: the required cygxpm-nox4.dll not found References: <80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D767B211A AT wilber DOT adroit DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robinow, David wrote: > It's in the Graphics category of Cygwin setup. > NTemacs, Xemacs native, and Xemacs cygwin all have their advantages, most > of which I can't remember off the top of my head. The cygwin version will > give you the best interaction with cygwin subprocesses. If you plan to use > emacs as an ide with gnu tools, I'd definitely recommend the cygwin version. But interaction between cygwin XEmacs and native subprocesses has problems (sun javac is particularly troublesome, I've heard). This is related to the CTRL-C problem that has been around forever -- but nobody cared about it enough to fix it, until now. It looks like Robert Collins is taking some valuable time away from setup.exe to track this down, so this deficiency of cygwin XEmacs may soon be a non-issue. Thanks, Robert. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/