Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D767B211A@wilber.adroit.com> From: "Robinow, David" To: "'Ralph Buse'" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: windows 98 message: the required cygxpm-nox4.dll not found Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:44:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" It's in the Graphics category of Cygwin setup. NTemacs, Xemacs native, and Xemacs cygwin all have their advantages, most of which I can't remember off the top of my head. The cygwin version will give you the best interaction with cygwin subprocesses. If you plan to use emacs as an ide with gnu tools, I'd definitely recommend the cygwin version. -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Buse [mailto:rbuse1 AT gwdg DOT de] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:29 AM To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: windows 98 message: the required cygxpm-nox4.dll not found Thanks for help. I hadn't set my path. And I simply don't have the DLL file. But: In which package is it? Is it in the xfree-distribution or in the normal one? Special Feature in any of these? Or do you recommend the xemacs native windows installation? I couldn't find any pros or cons on your (or the xemacs-) site. Ralph Buse -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/