Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 08:08:11 -0500 From: Jason Tishler To: Greg Matheson Cc: Cygwin Subject: Re: procmail (and SmartList) on cygwin Message-ID: <20020104130811.GE2008@dothill.com> Mail-Followup-To: Greg Matheson , Cygwin References: <017101c181a0$b47a29e0$738ffe0c AT pwork> <20011210134958 DOT A2088 AT dothill DOT com> <20011231153810 DOT A16346629 AT IBM973237G> <20020103141110 DOT GF1940 AT dothill DOT com> <20020104121305 DOT A60080 AT ms DOT chinmin DOT edu DOT tw> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020104121305.A60080@ms.chinmin.edu.tw> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Greg, On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:13:06PM +0800, Greg Matheson wrote: > On Thu, 03 Jan 2002, Jason Tishler wrote: > > Did you apply the patch... IIRC, then it > > should have solved the problem with the execv() test. > > It seems the patch had been applied. So, I changed line 1353 of > autoconf back to > > *(environ=nenv)="PATH=.";*nenviron=0;diff=argc; /* start doubling */ > > and now I get 2 error messages from Windows, about not being able to find > CYGWIN1.DLL, This makes perfect sense since the above changes PATH to only contain the current directory (i.e., "."). Hence, cygwin1.dll will not be found unless you copy it into the procmail source tree. Note this is what I initially did while trying to debug this problem. After this worked, I removed the (ill-advised) copy and tried the following: *(environ=nenv)="PATH=/usr/bin";*nenviron=0;diff=argc; Unfortunately, this caused the test program to crash. I was lame and gave up debugging and just settled with: *nenviron=0;diff=argc; which seemed sufficient. > [snip] > This is on Windows 98. My experience is on Windows 2000 so we may be observing some differences due to different platforms IIRC, http://www.dd.iij4u.or.jp/~madokam/ has a Windows 9x/Me specific patch that you may consider using. > I mentioned the existence of the executable on the procmail list, > but there was no reaction. No surprise. My experience on other lists seems to indicate that Cygwin is considered to be the "Rodney Dangerfield" of platforms. Sigh... Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/