Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 13:30:02 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected Message-ID: <20020101183002.GA9396@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <01df01c19259$1cbb8300$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <001101c192d0$11e99c60$865c07d5 AT BRAMSCHE> <20020101165921 DOT GA6767 AT redhat DOT com> <20020101185207 DOT A17787 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020101185207.A17787@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 06:52:07PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:59:21AM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 03:24:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: >> >Then search cygdll.a after those symbols and extract only the relevant >> >d000xxx.o from cygdll.a to a newly created import library named >> >libpthread.a or other revelant name. >> >> And, here is where I don't understand your confusion. You don't need to >> search cygdll.a. You already have a text file available to you which >> contains all of the exports from the cygwin DLL -- cygwin.def. > >Which results in some missing symbols in libc.a, namely the symbols >from $(LIBCOS). The change to have different link libs have let me >think that we could drop -lcygwin from the gcc specs file in favour >of -lc. But that's impossible w/o $(LIBCOS) linked to libc.a. Did >I missunderstood something here? Yes. We're not dropping libcygwin.a in favor of libc.a. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/