Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 14:12:32 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
Message-ID: <20011231191232.GA2796@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20011231171737 DOT GC1801 AT redhat DOT com> <000b01c1922d$3f42ca90$865c07d5 AT BRAMSCHE>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <000b01c1922d$3f42ca90$865c07d5@BRAMSCHE>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 07:59:15PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> Why would you infer that?  You ran 'nm' over cygdll.a.  Does that mean that all of the
>> symbols from cygdll.a were part of libpthread.a?
>> 
>No, only the symbols, which are defined in pthread.o, called the "reflib" in speclib. 

And why couldn't you do the same thing with cygwin.din?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/