Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3C2D1C9B.1080407@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 20:30:03 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: CVS and CR, LF References: <20011221134915 DOT 2829dad7 DOT david AT kosmosisland DOT com> <20011224204623 DOT 6fc8edb4 DOT david AT kosmosisland DOT com> <20011225154135 DOT GA883 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 08:46:23PM -0800, David Koski wrote: > >>You are correct about the mount points. I mounted in binary mode, then used cvs >>in bash and it now works correctly. Setting CYGWIN=binmode did not have the >>same effect. >> > > Nor should it. CYGWIN=binmode does not affect files when the files can be determined > via a mount point. Hmmm...I suppose this all means that I missed an open() or fopen() call somewhere in gdbm or cvs, and it needs to have the appropriate "O_BINARY" or "b" added. However, I'm nervous about making that sort of change even if I DO find one -- wouldn't that mess up folks who are happily using cvs with local working dirs on textmode mounts? Or is that a non-existent class of users, and everybody using cvs is also using binary mode mounts? Can anybody who uses text mode local mounts birddog this for me? --Chuck gdbm/cvs cygwin maintainer -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/