Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 18:16:59 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Setup.exe "other URL" functionality Message-ID: <20011228231659.GA788@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <001301c18f9e$3c7b1ab0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <17996382350 DOT 20011228141206 AT familiehaase DOT de> <009201c18fa2$a83230a0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <29101909217 DOT 20011228154413 AT familiehaase DOT de> <01ac01c18ff4$657a4a70$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01ac01c18ff4$657a4a70$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 10:07:16AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >Won't that cause problems on textmode mounts? It shouldn't. A program sees \n line endings regardless. In "text mode" the line endings can be either \r\n (CRLF) or \n (LF). So, writing the program with just \n should be fine for everything but some archaic Windows programs. cgf >=== >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Gerrit P. Haase" >To: >Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 1:44 AM >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Setup.exe "other URL" functionality > >> 2001-12-28 15:43:22, du schriebst: >> >> > Isn't automode read-in-text, write in binary? >> >> Everything written is in binmode, regardless what type the >> mounts are. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/