Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <045401c18f33$844d7f60$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Jason Tishler" , "Ralf Habacker" Cc: "Cygwin" References: <000c01c18e49$22279220$526307d5 AT BRAMSCHE> <20011227180503 DOT GD2204 AT dothill DOT com> Subject: Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 11:06:35 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Dec 2001 00:06:26.0582 (UTC) FILETIME=[7E293B60:01C18F33] === ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Tishler" > After the above is completed, then I would entertain adding such an > option if the community deemed it appropriate. But, wouldn't > implementing it via ReBaseImage()'s fReBase parameter as opposed to > plucking certain bytes out of the executable be a better approach? I > presume that this is how MS implements their '-s' (just sum image range) > option. IMO we should be using bfd not the MS helper libraries - in the long term. Otherwise one cannot do any of this as part of a cross compile or cross-manipulation toolkit. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/