Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 13:43:28 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Setup.exe snapshot
Message-ID: <20011223184328.GB21163@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <02b801c18bb1$ad62f360$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <02b801c18bb1$ad62f360$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 11:59:33PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>* Dependencies will only trigger installation of a package - they won't
>force an upgrade of an installed package. (with the caveat that in the
>future versioned dependencies may force upgrades).

Isn't this what has consistently gotten us into trouble?  Why not force
an update of a package if a package that depends on it is being upgraded?
This seems more intuitive to me.

Also, if we have no way to install all packages, then I think this new
release should be delayed.  We've been promising this for months.

If all that we need, however, is for upset to add things to a "Full"
category, which can be selected, I can do that.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/