Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 07:15:52 -0500
From: Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
To: "Cygwin Mailing List (E-mail)" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: mutt/procmail lock problem
Message-ID: <20011220121552.GA2396@dothill.com>
Mail-Followup-To: "Cygwin Mailing List (E-mail)" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
References: <000201c187f3$8f013bf0$2101a8c0 AT BRAEMARINC DOT COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <000201c187f3$8f013bf0$2101a8c0@BRAEMARINC.COM>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i

Gary,

On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 12:41:07PM -0600, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
> > > > and then releasing a new mutt package.
> > >
> > > Or perhaps... two? ;-)
> >
> > Why two?
> 
> I've got the 1.3.24 "released beta" working better than 1.2.5i now (I got
> binary sending and recieving and mboxes working regardless of mount type).
> But keep it under your hat, we don't want to cause a stampede ;-).

Ah, now I understand the reference.  This a good news!  I look forward
to your 1.3.x release, so I can pitch my private build and start using
the official one again...

Thanks,
Jason

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/