Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <00c801c18932$d757cc30$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: , References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20011219103326 DOT 0166d180 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3C20BBD0 DOT 3030502 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200112200844 DOT fBK8iQx13965 AT www1 DOT translationforge> Subject: Re: RPM 4 under cygwin Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 19:46:38 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2001 08:47:10.0807 (UTC) FILETIME=[E9DD9E70:01C18932] Then why not help us get deb/rpm support into setup.exe rather than just complaining that we don't understand. This HAS been covered. Many times. It's in the archives. RPM as static port is *not good enough*. Neither is dpkg. As a userland tool for building packages, yes, but thats a different story. Rob ... There are 100 times more Linux developpers than $Windows developpers. Why to reinvent the wheel with another installation format? Do you really think you can create a universal format including DEB and RPM? Then you need to produce more work than the creators of these formats. This is such a difficult project... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/