Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <118101c1860b$61b48fb0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Jason Tishler" , "Cygwin" Cc: "Michael Hudson" , References: <20011210074629 DOT B2148 AT dothill DOT com> Subject: Re: dll_list::load_after_fork() blues (was Re: [ python-Bugs-489709 ] Building Fails ...) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 19:26:37 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Dec 2001 08:26:28.0974 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C05F0E0:01C1860B] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Tishler" > - cygwin1.dll: since I believe that it relies on being based > at 0x61000000 It does not rely on any base address per se. It *does* reply on the base address being consistent between forked/spawned and exec'd parent and children. That means that the base address must be one of the following: a) Whatever is in the .dll, in all cygwin processs (for a given process hierarchy). (ie it can be different for different invocations of cygwin.bat). b) Relocated consistently on the fly in all cygwin processs (for a given process hierarchy). (ie it can be different for different invocations of cygwin.bat). > - cygcurl-2.dll: because it gets "whacked" by rebase and > AFAICT is not used by Python anyway Can you detail 'whack' a little more? > - cygtclpip80.dll: because it appears not to be relocatable What error do you get? > Unfortunately, when I run the complete Python regression test, I still > get the same three test failures as reported by Michael without rebasing: > > test_popen2 > test_pty > test_socket > > When I run these tests individually (i.e., not part of the complete test > suite), then they pass. Hence, the rebasing appears not to completely > solve this problem. Can you get process explorer to show their address space - get them to fail, and stop rather than terminating (usually there is a dialog you could leave open or you can use the CYGWIN debug flags). Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/