Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Reply-To: From: "Norman Vine" To: "'Michael Hudson'" , "'Jason Tishler'" Cc: "'Cygwin'" , Subject: RE: dll_list::load_after_fork() blues (was Re: [ python-Bugs-489709 ] Building Fails ...) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:52:08 -0500 Message-ID: <008101c1819b$021aa860$a300a8c0@nhv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: Michael Hudson writes: > >On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jason Tishler wrote: > >> Unfortunately, when I run the complete Python regression test, I still >> get the same three test failures as reported by Michael without rebasing: >> >> test_popen2 >> test_pty >> test_socket >> >> When I run these tests individually (i.e., not part of the complete test >> suite), then they pass. Hence, the rebasing appears not to completely >> solve this problem. > >FWIW, and I don't know how much that is, all tests pass if I link _socket >statically. Oh, and this is building without threads, it seems. I'll do >a new build with threads and see if anything changes, but I doubt it. GREAT IDEA ! I just rebuilt python 2.1.1 with threads and linking _socket statically and all seems to work :-) === / usr / src / python-2.1.1 / Modules / Setup.local # Edit this file for local setup changes # socket line above, and possibly edit the SSL variable: SSL=/usr _socket socketmodule.c \ -DUSE_SSL -I$(SSL)/include -I$(SSL)/include/openssl \ -L$(SSL)/lib -lssl -lcrypto Thanks Michael Norman -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/