Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <087b01c17e85$bc4b34c0$0500a8c0@boostconsulting.com> Reply-To: "David Abrahams" From: "David Abrahams" To: Cc: "David Abrahams" Subject: -mno-cygwin with newer GCC? Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:41:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 ------ Request: If you can remember to, please reply to me personally in addition to sending your reply to the cygwin list. Thanks! ------ Hi, I'm trying to use -mno-cygwin with a Cygwin GCC-3.0.2 that I built from sources. It seems that there are some preprocessor symbol definitions missing, for example: _U=01 _L=02 _N=04 _S=010 _P=020 _C=040 _X=0100 _B=0200 // for ctype_base _GLIBCPP_HAVE_MBSTATE_T it gets the wrong definition of _GLIBCPP_HAVE_ACOSF et. al. from std_cmath. Is there a way to make this work? It seems to me that the MINGW community (and Cygwin for that matter) is pretty committed to gcc-2.95.x, but I want the improved C++ compiler available with 3.0.2. Is anyone out there doing a similar thing, or am I completely out on a limb? TIA, Dave =================================================== David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire resume: http://users.rcn.com/abrahams/resume.html C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org) email: david DOT abrahams AT rcn DOT com =================================================== -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/