Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:49:36 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin 1.3.6-3 and xemacs
Message-ID: <20011206154936.GA22573@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT WNT DOT 4 DOT 33 DOT 0112060937500 DOT 1404-100000 AT MSD-PC3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.33.0112060937500.1404-100000@MSD-PC3>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:02:21AM +0000, Peter Keller wrote:
>There has also been some confusion in the cygwin mailing list with another
>problem to do with file completion in bash: see
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-12/msg00175.html . Fixing the
>shell file completion problem has NOT fixed the xemacs problem (although
>Christopher Faylor's thinking that it it might was not unreasonable).

I don't think I mentioned that I thought it would fix xemacs.

Someone should actually *debug the problem*.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/