Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <015001c17b88$71013dc0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Milscvaer" , References: <20011202201119 DOT 62959 DOT qmail AT web14503 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Subject: Re: A suggestion Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 09:33:25 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2001 23:24:07.0820 (UTC) FILETIME=[709D24C0:01C17B88] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Milscvaer" To: Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 7:11 AM Subject: A suggestion > Hello, > > I greatly enjoy and apprieciate using the Cygwin > system. I find it to be an extremely useful and > important software. Excellent. > I have a few suggestions on how it could be further > improved. There are some issues with what you describe. * Win9x has no interprocess security. ANY security can be bypassed with ~3 Win32 system calls. * On NT FAT drives, using Cygwin=NTEA will give you a similar result to what you describe. Lastly, there is an existing standard for putting *nix overlays onto a FAT drive. It's called UMSDOS, and I've a patch set for cygwin floating around somewhere that goes some way towards implementing it. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/