Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3C06CB41.2010604@home.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 18:56:49 -0500 From: "David A. Cobb" Organization: Excite/At-Home User via Cox User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bucky AT phantom DOT keystreams DOT com CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc not creating .exe References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit bucky AT phantom DOT keystreams DOT com wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >>On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 06:06:30PM -0800, bucky AT phantom DOT keystreams DOT com wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:52:03PM -0800, bucky AT phantom DOT keystreams DOT com wrote: >>>> >>>>>Excellent! Hiding the cygwin1.dll in /usr/local/lib fixed the gcc >>>>>problem, and it also fixed my "disappearing stderr" problem. >>>>> >>>>Why are you putting a version of cygwin in /usr/local/lib??? This is >>>>clearly wrong. >>>> >>>You assume too much. I never put any DLLs anywhere - it was like that >>>when I installed cygwin. >>> >>I'm not assuming anything. I *know* that no standard cygwin package >>installs a /usr/local/*/cygwin1.dll. In fact, AFAICT, there is no >>usr/local anywhere in the cygwin distribution, nor should there be. >> >>A moments worth of thought would lead you to this conclusion. Do you >>see all sorts of people complaining about the problems that you're >>seeing? No. Why do you think that is? Luck? >> >>So, if you truly have a /usr/local directory, it comes from something >>that you have either downloaded or built from outside of the standard >>cygwin distribution. >> >> > > Okay. > > I'm sorry if my previous reply came off as smart-assed. I should have > thought about it a few more seconds before I sent it out. > > I am quite positive that I have not myself installed anything in > /usr/local - aside from running the Cygwin setup, I'm doing my development > in /home, and I'm not getting anywhere _near_ doing DLL work. All I'm > looking for is a simple Linux-style development environment without having > to dual-boot my laptop. I wouldn't know where to start on the Windows > side. (I am an utter novice, would-be Cygwin user.) > > Is it possible that the mirror that I used (rcn) is not giving out the > standard cygwin distribution? Are there any decisions I could make in the > setup utility that would result in me getting a non-standard load, with a > cygwin1.dll in /usr/local? That's all I can think of at this point. > > Thanks, > David Chris already mentioned that SETUP does create an empty /usr/local tree. If you have installed, e.g. Xemacs, it is probably installed into /usr/local/lib/. . . . because that's one of the "normal" places for software that's specific to your site. -- David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate, All around nice guy. New PGP key 09/13/2001: : : Fingerprint=0x{E7C6_4EE2_6B75_5BA3_C52E__77FA_63C3_9366_DCFB_229B} "By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." --The Way of a Pilgrim, R. M. French [tr.] Potentially Viral Software is any software for which you are not allowed to examine the source. Do not buy or use Potentially Viral Software! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/