Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:16:37 +0100
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <gp AT familiehaase DOT de>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53t) Business
Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <4434079433.20011129221637@familiehaase.de>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: experimental texmf packages
In-Reply-To: <m37ks9lgxi.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
References: <m3bshtmxhb DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
 <878764062 DOT 20011128173421 AT nyckelpiga DOT de> <m37ks9lgxi DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sender: 320081107336-0001 AT t-dialin DOT net

Hallo Jan,

Am 2001-11-29 um 16:45 schriebst du:

> "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de> writes:

>> >     texconfig confall
>> >     texconfig rehash
>> >     texconfig init
>> 
>> Seems to work ok.

> Good.  Has this been tried with an automatic setup install, or did you
> run texconfig by hand?  It should work right out of the box.  It would

That was installed with setup.exe.  But I didn't tested much, so I would
like to do more testing.

> be good to have tetex-beta depend upon tetex-base, and libncurses5
> (for texconfig) imho; while having the other texmf packages should
> marked optional.  How do we arrange that?

There seem to be also be dependencies to libpng which causes errors.

> Also, what are the drills for a cygwin submission?  I'm not running
> cygwin myself (I'm allowed to use GNU/Linux at work :-)), but I've
> read something about setup hints...

Request at cygwin-apps and if there are three or more in favour to add it
and no objections, it is in.  If there are pros and contras it needs a
discussion.

>> I'm in favour to include it in the net release. (and if it is no problem
>> of my setup, tetex needs a rebuild?)

> I tried this, but it seems that a plain rebuild gives some (small)
> problems; the binary executables don't get a .exe extension, eg.

Ask the maintainer please.

> Greetings,
> Jan.

> Btw, how is your guile contribution coming along?

The static build is ok, same quality as yours, only two minor patches.
Dynamic seems to make problems at least with lilypond, also another guy
was not able to rebuild it with my patch, I think we should include the
static version and wait until 1.6 is released to provide a build with
static and dynamic libraries.

Ciao,

Gerrit P. Haase                            mailto:gp AT familiehaase DOT de
-- 
=^..^=


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/