Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Server-Uuid: 2d3b7162-db1d-11d3-b8ee-0008c7dfb6f1 Message-ID: <718198F862F1D411B10F0002A50A4DB101A4F0BD@e90wwce3.dx.deere.com> From: "Polley Christopher W" To: "'pgarceau AT qwest DOT net'" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: gcc not creating .exe Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:25:25 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-WSS-ID: 10188CE0787877-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Windows NT Ver 4.0 build 1381 Service Pack 5, but it looks like this is intended behavior... see hash::add_subdirs in ...\winsup\cinstall\install.cc, ca. line 170. > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul G. [SMTP:pgarceau AT qwest DOT net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:56 PM > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: RE: gcc not creating .exe > > Platform? > > On 28 Nov 2001 at 10:38, Polley Christopher W wrote: > > > This statement isn't entirely true. I just did an experiment > reinstalling > > only bash, then ash; deleting before each time my /usr/local/bin, > > /usr/local/etc, and /usr/local/lib directories. > > > > Although no packages explicitly contain the /usr/local directory > (according > > to http://cygwin.com/packages/), on these reinstalls, the > /usr/local/bin, > > /usr/local/etc, and /usr/local/lib directories are created (empty) > > (suprisingly, even if /usr/local is marked read-only) > > > > So while there isn't anything installed under /usr/local, the mere > existence > > of a /usr/local tree doesn't, apparently, indicate an installation > problem > > (unless I'm doing something wrong... ) > > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/