Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3C061A5F.7070809@algor.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:22:07 +0000
From: John Jones <john AT algor DOT co DOT uk>
Organization: Algorithmics
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: building from scratch, a cygwin enviroment
References: <3C061435 DOT 8090908 AT algor DOT co DOT uk> <017201c178c4$b408c000$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C0616C9 DOT 50004 AT algor DOT co DOT uk> <01d701c178c6$d605b300$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

hey

thanks again for the quick response (-;

right I cant use setup.exe from the cygwin env we use VISE to do various 
things (don't flame me that's the way life is I am not interested in this)

the real thing is collecting all the sources into a tree and building 
that source tree

so that they can be distributed on a CD

I wondered if anyone has done this before and had anything to share ?

regards

john jones

Robert Collins wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Jones" <john AT algor DOT co DOT uk>
> 
>>Robert Collins wrote:
>>
>>
>>>There shouldn't be anything to satisfy, download the the winsup
>>>
> sources,
> 
>>>and setup is included.
>>>
>>
>>err I need to build things so make and gcc are needed which was not in
>>the setup.exe default
>>
> 
> Crossed wires. I meant that there are no *source* dependencies. Yes, gcc
> is needed, and that should grab most everything else.
> 
> 
>>>>can you see anything wrong with this approach ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Uhmm, yes ;}. A minimal cygwin setup is installed via simply running
>>>setup.exe and not choosing any packages. That will only installpackages
>>>from base, which are the core packages required to install and maintain
>>>cygwin, in the opinion of the cygwin developers && package maintainers.
> 
>>>So you shouldn't have to do *anything*.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>yeah but I need to give users my own product as well as cygwin and
>>this all comes in one handy johnsetup.exe telling users that they have to
>>download additional stuff is not really an option so I have to buildand
>>provide a cygwin env
>>
>>any advice ?
>>
> 
> reply to mailing list emails on the list, not privately ;}.
> 
> Subscribe to cygwin-apps, and read the archives there. I think you'll
> find that setup.exe's default capabilities will more than suffice once
> the multi-mirror code is in production.
> 
> Rob
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/