Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: New Install May Have a Bug From: Robert Collins To: Charles Wilson Cc: Heribert Dahms , Mark Jones , Stephano Mariani , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <3C041931.1010405@ece.gatech.edu> References: <1006900876 DOT 2028 DOT 12 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3C041931 DOT 1010405 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.2 (Preview Release) Date: 28 Nov 2001 09:55:30 +1100 Message-Id: <1006901730.2028.18.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Nov 2001 22:56:43.0721 (UTC) FILETIME=[C896CB90:01C17796] On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 09:52, Charles Wilson wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > > What you are talking about is metapackages, which are implemented via > > categories, but need a new screen to allow the choice - simply for user > > clarity - as setup.exe can handle those packages now. > > > Right, but the 'Base' category is both a "category" in the sense you > describe, AND a metapackage(sortof) -- simply because everything in > 'Base' is automatically installed. > > Hence "add foo to 'Base'" really means "add foo to 'required' metapackage". > > But I get what you're saying; 'Base' seems to be THE special case. In > all other cases, 'categories' != 'metapackage' > Thanks for putting so clearly Chuck, yes that is what I am saying. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/