Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3C04195F.7080003@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:53:19 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Collins CC: Mark Jones , Stephano Mariani , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: New Install May Have a Bug References: <26149776 DOT 1006893828617 DOT JavaMail DOT imail AT blizzard DOT excite DOT com> <3C04056E DOT 9040401 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <1006899936 DOT 2028 DOT 6 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Robert Collins wrote: >> >>That's probably not a bad idea. Robert (Chris? Who maintains less?), >>should 'less' be added to the Base package? >> > > I don't think so. Once someone creates a metapackage, or I get the > clickable categories done, then the sensible user default becaomes > possible. The issue is that base really needs to be the _base_, not the > 'end user default' - because some users may want less installed. (No pun > intended). Ah, yes of course. You are correct. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/