Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:28:21 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc not creating .exe Message-ID: <20011127022821.GB13329@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20011126230626 DOT GB11238 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 06:06:30PM -0800, bucky AT phantom DOT keystreams DOT com wrote: >On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:52:03PM -0800, bucky AT phantom DOT keystreams DOT com wrote: >>>Excellent! Hiding the cygwin1.dll in /usr/local/lib fixed the gcc >>>problem, and it also fixed my "disappearing stderr" problem. >> >>Why are you putting a version of cygwin in /usr/local/lib??? This is >>clearly wrong. > >You assume too much. I never put any DLLs anywhere - it was like that >when I installed cygwin. I'm not assuming anything. I *know* that no standard cygwin package installs a /usr/local/*/cygwin1.dll. In fact, AFAICT, there is no usr/local anywhere in the cygwin distribution, nor should there be. A moments worth of thought would lead you to this conclusion. Do you see all sorts of people complaining about the problems that you're seeing? No. Why do you think that is? Luck? So, if you truly have a /usr/local directory, it comes from something that you have either downloaded or built from outside of the standard cygwin distribution. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/