Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:43:56 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: cygintl.dll missing
Message-ID: <20011121104356.J21630@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <009f01c17214$9d03d130$3396e4c2 AT MONTEZUMA> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20011120204158 DOT 0217cef8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20011121103409 DOT G21630 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <002a01c17270$1641a8f0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <002a01c17270$1641a8f0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:37:06PM +1100

On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:37:06PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> To: <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:34 PM
> Subject: Re: cygintl.dll missing
> 
> 
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 08:45:25PM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners,
> Inc) wrote:
> > > At 05:41 PM 11/20/2001, Martin Vit wrote:
> > > >Hello,
> > > >
> > > >I was installed cygwin and I want run vi.
> > > >System show me error message that
> > > >cygintl.dll could not be found.
> > > >
> > > >Where I can download this DLL library?
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm under the impression that this situation shouldn't occur anymore
> > > with the new setup (someone please correct me if I'm wrong).  It
> does
> >
> > Yeah, I'm surprised, too.  Vim requires gettext in
> setup.hint/setup.ini
> > so clicking on vim should activate gettext as well.
> 
> It will. What is probably happening is that folk are clicking on gettext
> until it is selected, and then clicking on vim, which means that they
> have selected the prev gettext version.

Oh, yes.  What about turning the order in setup to skip->curr->prev->test?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/