Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <002a01c17270$1641a8f0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <009f01c17214$9d03d130$3396e4c2 AT MONTEZUMA> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20011120204158 DOT 0217cef8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20011121103409 DOT G21630 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Subject: Re: cygintl.dll missing
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:37:06 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2001 09:37:02.0375 (UTC) FILETIME=[12FFEB70:01C17270]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: cygintl.dll missing


> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 08:45:25PM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners,
Inc) wrote:
> > At 05:41 PM 11/20/2001, Martin Vit wrote:
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >I was installed cygwin and I want run vi.
> > >System show me error message that
> > >cygintl.dll could not be found.
> > >
> > >Where I can download this DLL library?
> >
> >
> > I'm under the impression that this situation shouldn't occur anymore
> > with the new setup (someone please correct me if I'm wrong).  It
does
>
> Yeah, I'm surprised, too.  Vim requires gettext in
setup.hint/setup.ini
> so clicking on vim should activate gettext as well.

It will. What is probably happening is that folk are clicking on gettext
until it is selected, and then clicking on vim, which means that they
have selected the prev gettext version.

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/