Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <001b01c1719c$ea465800$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk> Reply-To: "fergus at bonhard dot uklinux dot net" From: "fergus at bonhard dot uklinux dot net" To: Cc: "Fergus on Linux" Subject: Where and what are /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ ? Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 08:25:29 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Using mount, I kind of know that /usr/bin/ is a ghost copy of /bin/, and /usr/lib/ is a ghost copy of /lib/ ... but ... 1. I don't really understand why both of /usr/bin/ and /bin/ are put on the path in /etc/profile; 2. I can move to /usr/bin/ using cd /usr/bin , but I can't see it using ls -al /usr ; 3. Time was when find / -name "ls*" [for example] would find both /bin/ls.exe and the virtual /usr/bin/ls.exe; now it just finds /bin/ls.exe I'm not bothered by any of this - I don't understand enough about the reasons underlying the virtual existence of these two folders - but could one of the Cygwin honchos confirm that all of (1) to (3) are expected and "correct" behaviours? Thanks. Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/