Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 13:21:56 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new site for my ports is up Message-ID: <20011118182156.GD11499@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <017d01c16f26$f05cf9b0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011117172920 DOT GA23168 AT redhat DOT com> <008b01c17036$00dca690$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008b01c17036$00dca690$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:36:17AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christopher Faylor" >> >> >As for putting multiple pacakges in the same dir - yes thats good but >> >let me get setup.hint subsumed into the package file first... >> >> No. No multiple packages in the same directory. Every package gets >> their own directory. > >Any particular reason? (maintenance/security/...?/) It's stupid? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/