Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3BF44A45.9DA8A866@wapme-systems.de> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 00:05:41 +0100 From: Stipe Tolj Organization: Wapme Systems AG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [de]C-CCK-MCD QXW0322b (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen CC: Robert Collins , Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: no more package moratorium? References: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011114124323 DOT C24614 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > What about existing packages? Specifically, it would be grand if > tetex-beta would either get fixed or removed. IMO, any "released" tagged package should have it's maintainer, who decides and tracks done error and bugs. So in ER specification we have a [package] n <-> 1 [maintainer] relation. Stipe tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: info AT wapme-systems DOT de Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/