Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3BF41EA5.5EEECD2F@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:59:33 -0500 From: Charles Wilson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Markus Hoenicka CC: Jan Nieuwenhuizen , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: tetex-beta nitpicking [WAS: Re: no more package moratorium?] References: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011114124323 DOT C24614 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <15348 DOT 5126 DOT 44000 DOT 631380 AT gargle DOT gargle DOT HOWL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Markus Hoenicka wrote: > > Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > > http://lilypond.org/wiki/?TroubleshootingWindows). We currently use > > and distribute MikTeX, because it works reliable, and right out of the > > box. > > You can't even install MiKTeX unless you run the latest Windows or the > latest Internet Explorer. Are you saying MikTeX only works on WXP? WRONG. I've run MikTeX 2.1 on W98, WNT, W2K (and have no reason to assume it won't work under WMe.) Now, I'm not arguing against tetex, but let's confine the arguments to factual ones, not FUD. Are you saying MikTeX only works with IE6.0? Again, WRONG. I've used MikTeX with IE5.0, 5.5, 5.5sp1, and 5.5sp2. If you wish to keep your IE4, then you can download the appropriate DLLs that enable the setup engine separately -- details given at the MikTeX website. Again, stick to facts, not FUD. > > > But I'd much rather we could use tetex. Using MikTeX from > > cygwin is `cygpath hell'. I guess. I've never had many problems. I use MikTeX + cygwin + make all the time, and rarely have to resort to cygpath (of course, I usually build using only relative directories, so D:\\ vs. /cygdrive/d isn't really an issue for me) There are arguments in favor of tetex over MikTeX, but the "latest Windows" or "latest IE" are not among them. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/