Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:14:47 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: no more package moratorium? Message-ID: <20011115191447.GC9348@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011114124323 DOT C24614 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <049601c16d58$d8565250$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011114224335 DOT GA10472 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:48:49AM +0100, Jesper Eskilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: > >> As long as I get veto power or whatever the opposite of veto power, >> that's fine with me. I'm not exactly Linus in this situation, I guess. > >The opposite of veto power is probably "nobody gives a damn". ;-) No, I meant, "Everybody gives a damn but I say yes anyway." cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/