Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com To: "Robert Collins" cc: "Corinna Vinschen" Subject: Re: no more package moratorium? References: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011114124323 DOT C24614 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Organization: Jan at Appel From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: 15 Nov 2001 12:19:27 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Robert Collins writes: > I think the process for that part should be something like > > sponsor (for new maintainers) or maintainer (2nd package or new > version > of existing) places the packages files at a URL. > They tell someone from . > uploads to cygwin.com. > > If there is _any_ doubt about the package quality, upload it as > experimental. Wait 3 weeks, and if there are no bugs reported, then > edit > setup.hint to make that new versiom current. > > Thoughts on this? What about existing packages? Specifically, it would be grand if tetex-beta would either get fixed or removed. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/