Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: From: Peter Ring To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: RE: AW: libxml2.dll, libxslt.dll, problems with executables linke d to dll's Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:31:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id fAF9Yu324902 libxml2/libxslt builds out of the box for me. I build from cvs sources. I have not tried building with shared libraries. You need recent autoconf/automake/libtool though. Canonical site http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/ There's a number of libtool ports available: Gerrit P. Haase http://timtowtdi.topcities.com/cygwin/libtool/ Ryan T. Sammartino ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/pc/gnuwin32/cygwin/porters/Sammartino_T_Ryan/ Robert Collins http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/robert-collins/contrib/li btool/ Are there any advantages to any of these? Are there any advantages to building libtool from the 1.4.2 source? Will libtool become part of the standard distribution? Are we waiting for autoconf/automake/libtool to become a bit more stable? Kind regards Peter Ring -----Original Message----- From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:39 PM To: Ralf Habacker Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: AW: libxml2.dll, libxslt.dll, problems with executables linked to dll's Hallo Ralf, 2001-11-14 17:34:39, du schriebst: > Hi, > Do you have tried the already available win32 binaries at > http://www.fh-frankfurt.de/~igor/projects/libxml/ ? > I have downloaded it, copied the dlls into /usr/local/bin and made a chown a+w > /usr/local/bin/*.dll and called testDocbook. It worked. Sorry to reply twice, but I wondered why I never heard of this site, now I know, there you get win32 binaries, I built them as 'native' Cygwin versions. That is a great difference! Cygwin != Windows If I want to have them for Windows, I would be able to run my MSVC and build it, the Windows builds are supported by xmlsoft, there are project files included in the source dist, Cygwin is not supported... Don't mix up the platforms, that is *bad*. Gerrit -- convey Information Systems GmbH http://www.convey.de/ Vitalisstraße 326-328 Gerrit P. Haase D-50933 Köln gerrit DOT haase AT convey DOT de Fon: ++49 221 6903922 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/