Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: no more package moratorium?
References: <F224RS8LbyiDFkBfMPA00001d21 AT hotmail DOT com>
	<007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<20011114124323 DOT C24614 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<049601c16d58$d8565250$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<20011114224335 DOT GA10472 AT redhat DOT com>
From: Jesper Eskilson <jojo AT virtutech DOT se>
Organization: Virtutech AB
Date: 15 Nov 2001 09:48:49 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20011114224335.GA10472@redhat.com> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2001 17:43:35 -0500")
Message-ID: <u67zo5oxvv2.fsf@rachel.vtab.com>
Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> writes:

> As long as I get veto power or whatever the opposite of veto power,
> that's fine with me.  I'm not exactly Linus in this situation, I guess.

The opposite of veto power is probably "nobody gives a damn". ;-)

/Jesper
-- 
Jesper Eskilson
Virtutech


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/