Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Robert Mecklenburg MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15346.40869.254000.127663@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:45:25 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Setup.exe Updated In-Reply-To: <200111140310.fAE3AOx02272@loony.cygnus.com> References: <200111140310 DOT fAE3AOx02272 AT loony DOT cygnus DOT com> X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under Emacs 21.1.1 RC> The long awaited setup.exe update has occured. Thank you for this excellent upgrade! A trivial observation: when I got to the package selection dialog (I don't know it's official name) the text on the "View" button was corrupted (i.e., pixels scrambled). Clicking it refreshed properly and fix the problem. Question 1: The dialog box which offers to create an short cut and menu item has the boxes checked by default. I've run previous versions of the setup tool many times (twice a week since the tool was released!) and always unchecked these boxes, but setup doesn't seem to remember my choice. I would swear that others in my organization using the tool have these boxes unchecked (presumably because it remembered their previous choice). So, I'm asking about the intended behavior - should setup remember the previous checked/unchecked status of the create short cut and create menu item boxes? Question 2: Would it make sense to have setup's source code downloadable from the setup tool? (Obviously, it would make less, no?, sense to be able to download setup.exe itself.) Thanks, -- Robert -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/