Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:45:24 +0300 From: egor duda X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53 RC/4) Reply-To: egor duda Organization: deo X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <13971066568.20011112134524@logos-m.ru> To: gilles civario CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc bug: different results between -O0 and -O1 In-Reply-To: <3BEFA31B.B06D4C37@mimosa.ceng.cea.fr> References: <3BEFA31B DOT B06D4C37 AT mimosa DOT ceng DOT cea DOT fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! Monday, 12 November, 2001 gilles civario civario AT mimosa DOT ceng DOT cea DOT fr wrote: gc> Wile developing a performance test program for gettimeofday resolution, gc> I found a strange behavior for gcc under cygwin with the -O flags. gc> Everywhere else with native compiler or with gcc, the program return constant gc> results, with or without optimization. (On Sun, Dec, Linux and Fujitsu) gc> Only with cygwin, the result is divided by 5000 from -O0 to -O1, both with gc> gcc version 2.95.3-5 (cygwin special) and gcc version 3.0.2. gc> But it shouldn't. Ok for a little increase, but not for 5000 ! you cannot reliably test float values for equality. you should rethink the logic of your boucle () function to get reliable results. Egor. mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/