Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 11:18:59 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Using gdb Message-ID: <20011109111859.G24506@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3BEBC1A2 DOT 3000408 AT netcom DOT es> <3BEBC1A2 DOT 3000408 AT netcom DOT es> <4 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 58 DOT 20011109171421 DOT 00a40ca8 AT ics DOT u-strasbg DOT fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011109171421.00a40ca8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 05:15:48PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote: >At 17:06 09/11/2001 , Christopher Faylor a ?crit: >>On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:44:34AM +0000, Ignasi Villagrasa wrote: >>>Christopher Faylor sent a message telling me there's no fix to my >>>problem using gdb. >>> >>>But at the same time Pierre Muller sent me an e-mail with a patch he has >>>tested that can be applied to gdb source before recompiling gdb. >> >>I've never seen this patch so I can't comment on it. > >See >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2001-11/msg00086.html > >I had to add some other form of .text equivalent >to get really all DLLs to be loaded correctly. Ah. You sent a patch to gdb rather than gdb-patches. That's why I couldn't find it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/