Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3BEAF733.6000102@sys-mail.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 22:20:51 +0100
From: joerg eichhorn <joerg DOT eichhorn AT sys-mail DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; de-AT; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913
X-Accept-Language: en-us, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: inetd on win95
References: <GMFF7W$I4lMo9pcXo8eU30qeKiy8HkmWwKOkmIm1hbMId1s5Ia0QlJ0 AT voila DOT fr> <20011107121139 DOT S2965 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

i have got the same problems, as described in the orginial mail by Raphael.

winver: Win9X Ver 4.90 build 73010104 (aut.: it is winme)
cygver: Cygwin DLL version info:
         dll major: 1003
         dll minor: 3
         dll epoch: 19
	build date: Wed Sep 12 23:54:31 EDT 2001

but what i found the following:
this won't work:
<snip>
foo AT bar ~
$ /usr/sbin/new/in.telnetd
/usr/sbin/new/in.telnetd: getpeername: The descriptor is a file, not a 
socket

foo AT bar ~
$
</snip>

but the following worked fine:
<snip>
foo AT bar ~
$ /usr/sbin/new/in.telnetd -debug

</snip>

wrapping the call into a shellscript named in.telnetd didn't work :-(

so how to understand that behavior?


mfg joerg


Tim Chick wrote:

> I sent a series of mails on this topic AT the start of June this year,
> with the subject:
> inetd under Win95 OSR2.5
> 
> I was using Winsock2.
> 
> I traced the problem as far as:
> A socket is duplicated as stdin. A socket operation is then performed
> on stdin, which fails with ENOTSOCK.
> 
> The following code demonstrated this:
> ns = accept(...)
> getpeername(ns, ...) -> Successful, and gets right answer
> dup2(ns,0)
> getpeername(0, ...) -> Fails with ENOTSOCK
> 
> I did not receive any other comments from the mailing list, so I presume
> the problem is still there.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tim



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/