Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: [PATCH] setup.exe: removes some memory leaks from fromcwd.cc From: Robert Collins To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20011105115003.A19389@redhat.com> References: <3BE2CC48 DOT 47462EC6 AT syntrex DOT com> <1004743324 DOT 9086 DOT 39 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE6642E DOT 9AA62568 AT syntrex DOT com> <1004997932 DOT 1663 DOT 2 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3BE68FC5 DOT C7CDF863 AT syntrex DOT com> <1005000062 DOT 1663 DOT 8 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011105115003 DOT A19389 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Date: 06 Nov 2001 08:56:28 +1100 Message-Id: <1004997389.4534.3.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Nov 2001 22:02:36.0189 (UTC) FILETIME=[93D23CD0:01C16645] On Tue, 2001-11-06 at 03:50, Christopher Faylor wrote: ... > >I'm really not worried about cleaning up globals at exit - I'm much more > >warried about cleaning up globals as we go, or as we change from dialog > >to dialog. Exit is a trapdoor, so it cannot be a 'problem'. > > Since the memory is going to be freed on exit anyway, I don't see any reason > to go to great lengths to invent a system for freeing it. > > setup.exe is a short-lived program. We should be good about freeing up memory > that we use because that's good programming but I don't think we have to > invent some kind of garbage collection system to deal with this. I think we are agreeing again, no? Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/