Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 13:37:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200111032137.NAA20201@geoffk.org> X-Authentication-Warning: localhost: geoffk set sender to geoffk AT geoffk DOT org using -f From: Geoff Keating To: dj AT redhat DOT com CC: binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, gdb AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com In-reply-to: <200111032102.fA3L25O07809@greed.delorie.com> (message from DJ Delorie on Sat, 3 Nov 2001 16:02:05 -0500) Subject: Re: auto-sync more files? Reply-to: Geoff Keating References: <200111032102 DOT fA3L25O07809 AT greed DOT delorie DOT com> > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 16:02:05 -0500 > From: DJ Delorie > > > The following directory and files are sorta common with the gcc > repository (obviously, MAINTAINERS isn't the same file, but the name > is). A few people have been asking for tighter syncing between these > two repositories for the files that can be sync'd. I am willing to > add these to the libiberty auto-sync script, but if I did it would > mean that your projects would need to go through gcc-patches to get > changes for these approved (like as already happens for libiberty). > > Comments? A bunch of these files are actually already mastered somewhere else, for instance config.sub and config.guess, and the libtool files; it'd probably be better to have the script get them directly from the master. -- - Geoffrey Keating -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/