Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 19:32:59 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: A bug (?) in the current setup.exe 2.78.2.15
Message-ID: <20011102193259.A31762@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <001201c163a7$5d1610e0$6fc82486 AT medschool DOT dundee DOT ac DOT uk> <3BE2E375 DOT EB32B4E4 AT syntrex DOT com> <1004744797 DOT 9054 DOT 65 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1004744797.9054.65.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 10:58:51AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>There is a longer discussion we can have, about package versions,
>sequence holes and trust levels, but I need to assemble some thoughts
>first.

FWIW, I have a patch which makes this slightly better, I think, but
it shouldn't be extremely hard to do the right thing in scan2.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/