Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: setup test #4 From: Robert Collins To: Paul Garceau Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <3BE1DE91.3862.B9D979@localhost> References: <3BE1CEA9 DOT 7498 DOT 7BB70C AT localhost> <3BE1DE91 DOT 3862 DOT B9D979 AT localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Nov 2001 18:59:08 +1100 Message-Id: <1004687949.6899.2.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2001 08:03:24.0455 (UTC) FILETIME=[D89C1B70:01C16374] On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 18:45, Paul G. wrote: > > > On 2 Nov 2001 at 17:52, the Illustrious Robert Collins wrote: > > > On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 17:37, Paul G. wrote: > > > snapshot -4 > > > > > Does "Keep" care whether binary has been installed or not? If not, > > > then "Keep+src=ticked" would handle this nicely. > > > > Yes, keep is for the case where a package is installed. Additionally, > > there is no uninstall for source currently! > > Ok. > > Think I found another bug, one that could be changed in to a "feature" ;-). > > It is assumed that you have already downloaded the binary using setup.exe -4. > > When uninstalling a binary package, such as patch, from setup.exe, the logical result is > that the patch binary is removed. > > You can then, using snapshot -4, download the source by selecting revision 0.0 and setting > "src=ticked". Interesting. The funny/interesting thing is that if you have the binary installed, revision > 0.0 does not appear ;-). Revision 0.0 only appears after an uninstall of the binary package has > occurred, or at least so it would seem. Which package? I just tried this cron, and while it did default to "source" rather the current version - something I'm about to fix :} - it wouldn't show 0.0 for me. 0.0 is show for packages that don't have a version stamp - and some of the old packages don't or didn't have versions. You may have 'lucked' onto one of those in the 'prev' field. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/