Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 23:20:01 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Re[2]: setup testers wanted Message-ID: <20011101232001.A8653@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20011101205025 DOT A6760 AT redhat DOT com> <3BE1ACA4 DOT 31295 DOT 165BFA4 AT localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BE1ACA4.31295.165BFA4@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 08:12:20PM -0800, Paul G. wrote: > > >On 2 Nov 2001 at 14:57, the Illustrious Robert Collins wrote: > >> On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 12:50, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 12:09:34PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >> > >How about we get rid of either 'skip' or 'keep' - they are the same >> > >AFAIK. >> > >> > We had this discussion in cygwin-developers. They are subtly >> > different. One implies that the package exists on disk and you'll be >> > keeping it. The other implies that you will not be installing the >> > package. >> >> Sure, but will users grok this? > >Nope. Not the naive newbie, that is for sure. Especially considering >the subtlties weren't able to be easily addressed when cgf replied. No, but it shouldn't be particularly confusing either. I doubt that anyone would be surprised to select either "keep" or "skip" and have nothing happen. I just think that keep and skip should not ever appear in the same package selection. It's a bug if they do. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/