Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 23:09:36 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Re[2]: setup testers wanted Message-ID: <20011101230936.B7485@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1004622067 DOT 3342 DOT 30 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <1381809501 DOT 20011101100915 AT earthlink DOT net> <1004657351 DOT 4644 DOT 7 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <1004658066 DOT 4644 DOT 15 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <7825503011 DOT 20011101164409 AT earthlink DOT net> <1004663375 DOT 5083 DOT 12 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011101205025 DOT A6760 AT redhat DOT com> <1004673424 DOT 5367 DOT 66 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1004673424.5367.66.camel@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 02:57:03PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 12:50, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 12:09:34PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >> >How about we get rid of either 'skip' or 'keep' - they are the same >> >AFAIK. >> >> We had this discussion in cygwin-developers. They are subtly different. >> One implies that the package exists on disk and you'll be keeping it. >> The other implies that you will not be installing the package. > >Sure, but will users grok this? > >Hmm, maybe we shouldn't show skip for non installed packages? That sounds right. I think I tried, at one point, to ensure that both skip and keep never showed up for the same category but obviously I wasn't successful. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/