Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: From: "Schaible, Jorg" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: Updated: gdb-20010428-2 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:18:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Hi Chris, >>Windows is really a crap. > >Oh yes. That's right. I think I even resisted this patch, >mainly because >I could not believe that Windows was really that stupid. > >I have a hard time with the idea that I have to add >Windows-specific code >to gdb at this point. I had an ITS (In The Shower) experience >today and >realized that, of course, I could use the FindFirstFile technique to >get the right filename and your email confirms that. > >This is a really hard change to make, though. It will be like >typing in >molasses getting this patch into gdb. It just feels so wrong. It does. Couldn't you just ignore the settings for check_case loading the DLL's in GDB? It seems, that the problems only arises when simulating Windows internal file operations. Windows does not take care of the case anyway, so why should Cygwin? The check_case is "just" for ported Unix apps that do not know of this Windows internal behaviour. They may only use the functionality (loading a depending DLL) as service out-of-the-box, GDB is therefore just an exception. Regards, Jorg -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/