Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:57:34 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: bgat AT billgatliff DOT com Subject: Re: [1.3.3] breaks serial i/o? Message-ID: <20011023115734.A22115@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, bgat AT billgatliff DOT com References: <20011018222406 DOT C11830 AT redhat DOT com> <20011019085618 DOT A5013 AT saturn DOT billgatliff DOT com> <20011019114712 DOT A23101 AT visi DOT com> <028e01c1594f$47cf7030$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011020150809 DOT A3610 AT saturn DOT billgatliff DOT com> <20011020190254 DOT A27597 AT redhat DOT com> <20011020203703 DOT A4217 AT saturn DOT billgatliff DOT com> <20011020223934 DOT A28028 AT redhat DOT com> <20011021003044 DOT A29855 AT redhat DOT com> <20011021003913 DOT A29884 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011021003913.A29884@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i Any updates on this? cgf On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 12:39:13AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 12:30:44AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 10:39:34PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>However, before we reach this drastic step, I'd *really* suggest at >>>least trying the 5.1 branch of gdb. Your errors sound very similar >>>to others that were reported with ARM. It is very possible that >>>they were fixed subsequent to 5.0. >> >>I have just spelunked through the cvs logs in the rdi-share directory >>and it looks like most relevant changes to gdb for arm/rdi did make >>it into gdb 5.0 so this probably is not going to hold out much promise. >> >>>From looking at gdb's code it seems like select is returning a TRUE >>for something to select on the serial line but when it is time to >>read something, apparently nothing is available. >> >>I guess I really will have to make a cable and connect my linux and >>windows systems to test this... > >One suggestion for the gdb code -- add an '| O_BINARY' to all of the >opens of the serial line in unixcomm.c. I can see a pathological >condition in cygwin where a VMIN setting will not be properly honored if >there is a readahead condition due to a '\n' -> '\r\n' conversion. > >This could cause the code to block but even if it wasn't blocking, I >assume that you probably don't want to do newline conversions. > >This probably isn't going to fix the problem since the default is for >cygwin to not do this kind of conversion on devices but it's best to be >safe anyway. > >cgf > >-- >Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html >Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- cgf AT cygnus DOT com Red Hat, Inc. http://sources.redhat.com/ http://www.redhat.com/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/